Monday, 24 December 2018

2018 in Cinema

I seem to have gotten into the habit of writing an end of year round up (see 2016 and 2017), and I don't really know why I keep writing them. I’m a lot less engaged in film culture than I used to be. The effort I once went to to keep track of which directors had films on the way in the next year or so and which festivals they might premiere at and all that kind of thing is now channeled into more rewarding areas of my life. I still keep an ear to the ground, but long gone are the Google Sheets filled with films, premiere dates, self-imposed hierarchies of interest. I tweet less and less. I only use Letterboxd for tracking what I watch and leaving the odd review or list. I write occasionally on here. I still watch movies, and I still care about what's happening. I'm just checking out of the online aspect of it. I don't enjoy it. More and more, the art feels secondary to the idea of being publicly seen to have the correct opinion on it, and the idea of having the correct, and therefore only, perspective on any kind of cultural object cannot be healthy, particularly when that opinion is policed. If you don't like Twin Peaks you're an idiot. If you like Suspiria you're a potato. It's all a bit too dystopian for my tastes.

This is just one part of film culture, of course, and it shouldn't be enough on its own to dissuade me from caring about the rest of it. I don't get to travel to see films very often as I don't work in the industry, but when I do, I'm able to treat film festivals as holidays. I like to enjoy films as an interest rather than as a profession. I have no obligations to write coverage of festivals so it's easy to relax and enjoy myself. The drawback, though, is that I don't get to see as much as I'd like to. I've not, for example, been able to see films like Christian Petzold's Transit or Stéphane Brizé's At War or Carlos Reygadas's Our Time, all films that I'm very keen to see but none of which have screened at the festivals I've been to or been released in UK cinemas. However, I do think that I see enough to get an idea, at least, of the themes dominating the year's cinematic output. Either that, or I project myself onto the films that I do see and only start to notice when an overarching theme begins to emerge. However it happens, it amounts to the same thing, and what I've encountered most often in the films I've seen in 2018 is an overwhelming sense of dissatisfaction with the world. Lost pasts, doomed futures, a fog-shrouded present. A feeling that the infrastructure will crumble while the political hierarchies endure. Films about lies, cover-ups, paranoia, injustices. Films about how technology smothers humanity, about how nostalgia poisons culture. Films about the glass that separates us from each other. Films about death. However I've got here, the following twelve films, twelve because I always do twelve, are the films that have stayed firmest in my thoughts. For better or for worse, this is what I've got.

In alphabetical order:

An Elephant Sitting Still | Hu Bo
Ash is Purest White | Jia Zhang-ke
Burning | Lee Chang-dong
First Man | Damien Chazelle
Happy as Lazzaro | Alice Rohrwacher
I Don’t Care If We Go Down In History As Barbarians | Radu Jude
If Beale Street Could Talk | Barry Jenkins
La Flor | Mariano Llinas
Monrovia, Indiana | Frederick Wiseman
Ready Player One | Steven Spielberg
Support The Girls | Andrew Bujalski
Suspiria | Luca Guadagnino
__________

I started the year with the intention of writing more than I did last year. It certainly doesn't feel as if I have, but, nevertheless, I've written some things that I'm proud of.

Here are my five favourites, in chronological order.

1) On doors and paint in Maurice Pialat's L'Enfance Nue
2) On Brian De Palma's homage to John Everett Millais in Femme Fatale
3) On my solitary day at the Edinburgh Film Festival
4) On Lee Chang-dong's Burning
5) On the films of David Cronenberg
__________

10 albums.

Ye | Kanye West
Iridescence | Brockhampton
Be The Cowboy | Mitski
Ruiner | nothing, nowhere
Kids See Ghosts | Kids See Ghosts
Some Rap Songs | Earl Sweatshirt
Nearer My God | Foxing
Lost & Found | Jorja Smith
Charmer | Charmer
7 | Beach House
__________

going through catastrophe, while all these humans laugh at me // 
it seems as they were born a different breed.
we must lend a hand to those who feel they're at the end // 
an act of love can really go the distance.

Catastrophe | Brennan Savage

I've listened to this track a lot this year, an incredibly direct song simultaneously appalled by human behaviour and hopeful that human goodness will shine through in the end. Everything's so toxic, but we can still get through it.
__________

M. Butterfly | David Cronenberg, 1993
Twilight's Last Gleaming | Robert Aldrich, 1977
Always | Steven Spielberg, 1989
Streets of Fire | Walter Hill, 1984
Van Gogh | Maurice Pialat, 1991
Poetry | Lee Chang-dong, 2010
Home From The Hill | Vincente Minnelli, 1960
Djinn | Tobe Hooper, 2013
Pola X | Leos Carax, 1999
Loving You | Johnnie To, 1995

Ten discoveries. I should probably dig deeper next year.
__________

Four memories from the year. Please allow me this indulgence.

In early June, listening to Ye over and over again on a delayed flight from New York City to London, somewhere above the Atlantic Ocean at 3am, or 7am, lost in jetlagged delirium and near-darkness, the hazy light of seat-back screens illuminating the aisles as people sleep face down on tray-tables. Virtual planes track our course across 3D globes on a dozen screens in my eyeline. The Titanic sank somewhere out the window more than a hundred years ago.

In July, getting entirely too emotional watching Eric Dier bury a dreadful penalty as England finally win a World Cup shoot out. It’s hard to explain the emotion of watching the national football team, an entity that I’ve been raised to love wholeheartedly, surpass all bottomed out expectations and succeed, particularly in a year in which the leaders of this country seem intent on debasing themselves at any opportunity. For a few brief moments in the summer things felt good in England. That’s something to be happy about, I think.

In October, watching La Flor, 808 minutes joyous of cinema, with Matt and some similarly embattled film folk across three weekday mornings and afternoons at the London Film Festival. Daily rituals: walking as slowly as possible from Piccadilly Circus to the ICA to breathe as much relatively fresh, unseasonably warm air as possible; tucking into a delicious Boost bar, a staple of my durational cinema endeavours, during the first intermission of each day; the frequent glimpses at Matt’s increasingly diagrammatic notes and meal deal choices, both equally impressive; actress Elisa Carricajo's cryptic daily introductions, telling us roughly when to expect each intermission based on the topic of conversation in a specific scene. All in all, a lot of time that I'm glad I spent where I spent it.

In November, losing myself for an afternoon at the V&A’s impressively vast Videogames: Design / Play / Disrupt, an exhibition focused on artistry in gaming. I’m both fascinated by gaming as a medium and dismissively terrible at video games, so this was always going to be an interesting experience. I’d never really considered how a game’s form could be used to enrich the ideas and themes of a game before, but now, having seen striking examples of this from Bloodborne and The Last of Us, in particular, my eyes have been opened to how much of this fledgeling artform I’ve either taken for granted or missed entirely. I’ve got some catching up to do.
__________

I should be more active.
I should put more work in.
Let's see where my time goes.
__________

Sunday, 2 December 2018

David Cronenberg, Ranked




The Fly | David Cronenberg, 1986
M. Butterfly | David Cronenberg, 1993
Crash | David Cronenberg, 1996

I've been watching David Cronenberg's filmography from (pretty much) start to finish over the past month or so as a post Halloween project of sorts. No real reason beyond curiosity, really, or more specifically an interest in seeing everything in the context of a progression of ideas. Cronenberg is a guy whose work has peppered my film education for years, from a secondhand VHS copy of The Fly that I bought for 50p at a boot fair in the mid-2000s at far too young of an age to really be watching something so traumatic, to laughing my way through A History of Violence in a GCSE Media Studies class with my friend Robin because we found the "my name's Tom" scene so patently absurd, to becoming obsessed with the frankly incredible French teaser trailer for Cosmopolis just before its Cannes premiere during my final year of university, and so on and so forth. I'd been wanting to revisit a lot of this stuff, and to finally catch up with the few that I'd somehow not gotten around to yet, for a long time, and I'd especially wanted to get a better idea of what Cronenberg is about. The chill of late autumn seems to fit his vibe pretty well, too.

Now, having revisited every feature but the first two, the near-silent 60 minute oddities Stereo and Crimes of the Future, both of which I struggled with before abandoning my efforts entirely after ten minutes apiece, I feel I can say with certainty that, without really being able to articulate exactly why or how, the lingering presence of Cronenberg's work in my blossoming cinephilia has had a significant impact on how I think and feel about movies. As an attempt to get closer to this, I've put 19 of Cronenberg's films into an order of preference, or of reverence; some kind of hierarchy based on my experiences with each of them. I've also written something about them all. Impressions, mostly, or observations, summaries, the odd comparison or two. Something, at least. Ideally the process of doing this will help me to understand what it is that makes these movies speak so clearly to me. Maybe it won't, but, at the very least, it'll be an interesting time capsule for me when I inevitably disagree with everything I've said here in a few weeks, months or years from now.

-----

1. M. Butterfly (1993)

So much all at once, and, appropriately, so well disguised. The weaponisation of cultural stereotypes becomes weaponised love when the stereotype proves impenetrable, but, ultimately, the downfall of Jeremy Irons' French diplomat is not his blindness, but rather the misplaced confidence his blindness facilitates once everything seems to be going his way. An initially meek, easily intimidated man is lent an air of brash hubris by this blossoming romance, as if, for the first time in his life, he feels valued, valuable, a focal point for other people. He's more sociable, he drinks more, he makes rash decisions, he fucks around, he speaks louder and with more authority. His newly-inflated ego clouds his judgment in a way that he can't handle, ultimately destroying him far before the reality of his relationship with "my butterfly" finally and brutally dawns on him.

2. Crash (1996)

Total blankness. I've never read Ballard but I think he's someone whose mindset I can get on board with, and, based on this, Cronenberg is certainly on his wavelength. Sex and destruction, technology and flesh. A soundscape drawn from individual cars, totally at odds with the perceived increase in vehicles on the roads, and whispered, breathy voices, barely audible at all and separate, isolated, alone. A coldness created by metal and glass. Scars and limps point to a violent history, and the intersecting infrastructure of city roads suggests a preparation for an inevitable future. Dense, painful, bleak. The end of the world.

3. The Fly (1986)

The ultimate romantic tragedy, and an idea that Cronenberg would refine further in M. Butterfly. Again, a quiet, meek man is transformed by love, only here it's his lack of rationality that catalyses it when his new girlfriend leaves in the middle of the night to confront an ex-boyfriend who is harassing her. Brundle, believing her to be sleeping with him and fuelled by this imaginary challenge to his masculinity, makes a choice that ultimately destroys him. A surprisingly long-winded set-up introduces Brundle's nervous, charming, neglected personality, making the initially acute post-teleportation changes in his behaviour more pronounced, and making it clear that something is wrong far before this transformation is literalised as something physical.

4. The Dead Zone (1983)

A man awakens from a five-year coma with an unexplained ability to see into people's pasts and futures by touching them, and begrudgingly becomes first a detective, then a political assassin. A fascinating film about power, and one reminiscent of De Palma's Blow Out, in that both are about people who know something that they don't want to know and are forced to act on it out of necessity. Christopher Walken's ex-schoolteacher has to act as he knows that his inaction will have profound consequences: stopping an ice hockey game so the ice doesn't break, catching a mass-murderer to save lives, assassinating a politician to avert a nuclear war, all because he has seen the danger, even if his behaviour makes no sense to anyone else. As well as these averted disasters, Cronenberg shows some of Walken's predictions coming true, too, making it clear that his prophetic visions are indeed prophetic rather than simple hallucinations, removing all doubt and lending his later dilemmas a more troubling sense of moral cost. "If you could go back in time to Nazi Germany, before Hitler came to power, knowing what you know now, would you kill him?"

5. Cosmopolis (2012)

"Look how good they feel". As dense and surreal as Naked Lunch but, I think, significantly more palatable, perhaps simply because DeLillo's control is, to me at least, far more interesting than Burroughs's lack of it. The wilful self-destruction of an immensely powerful man blind to the ramifications such a collapse will create, locked away in a soundproofed car in the middle of gridlocked traffic, talking about buying the Rothko Chapel to put in his apartment and watching increasingly violent protests on the streets of Manhattan from behind tinted glass. Information wielded as a weapon, as a form of control, a form of security, and having it all stripped away in the blink of an eye to leave nothing but chaos and vulnerability — which is precisely what he wants.

6. Dead Ringers (1989)

"You haven't had any experience unless I've had it too." Inseparable twin brothers who live together and work together, both drawn to a patient with a trifurcated cervix and dragged apart by her presence in their lives: Beverly, the meeker of the two, falls in love with her, and Elliot, the extrovert, doesn't want the dynamic to change. But it's so much more than that, of course. Such a complex film, and so well crafted. "We are perceived as one person," but Jeremy Irons imbues them both with so much individual depth, not just in affection or character but in their respective collapses. These are two totally separate, totally different minds. Glass and metal. "Are you afraid that when it came down to it I wouldn't be able to tell the difference?"

7. eXistenZ (1999)

The mind creates the universe and its rules, and conflicting layers of reality and virtual reality blur together in a game world. Gaming is mass-entertainment. Game designers are superstars. "Game Pods" are made from frog organs, free-will is occasionally removed to further the narrative, dream logic and nightmare imagery. Significantly more interesting to me than Videodrome, which is, I think, the closest point of comparison, but perhaps only because we're currently in the process of seeing its prescience come to fruition — or maybe because its mind-altering qualities are both a natural extension of its existence and drawn from the mind of the player rather than an external source. "I actually think there's an element of psychosis involved here." "That's a great sign."

8. A Dangerous Method (2011)

"Never repress anything" seems to be key here, as repression is exactly what poisons Freud and Jung's relationship. The initial frankness and enthusiasm of their discussions paves the way to fierce debate and, ultimately, an intellectual impasse. Neither man wants to cede ground to the other, so they lie, they hold things back, they resist each other's ideas, until they've driven themselves so far from each other that there's no reason to keep speaking at all. Cronenberg has the time of his life illustrating these shifting power dynamics through high and low angles, minute behavioural details, little glances, vocal inflections and, in particular, the oft-noted split-diopter shots, suggesting a constant analysis in progress by a dominant force on the periphery. He's never been one to hold back.

9. Shivers (1975)

The death of civilisation. A Ballardian, self-sustaining apartment block on an island in the shadow of a city, with a supermarket and a doctor's surgery on-site and a bridge serving as the only link to the mainland, falls into chaos when people come out of their homes seeking contact with one another. A warning of the dangers of an isolated high-rise lifestyle, all concrete and fake wood, sold as a commodity on the verge becoming the norm. "I'm hungry for love" as the cry of a monster. Blood trails on blank white walls.

10. Videodrome (1983)

A chance encounter with a hyper-violent TV transmission sets in motion a hallucinatory misadventure for a TV executive. He needs to find transgressive new shows for his network in order to remain in business. "I'm looking for something that will break through." A signal with the potential to change reality, and a conspiracy to open it up to the masses. A chaotic, maddening, visceral film about our obsession with images on screens and their power to manipulate and control individual thought, and one that I could happily never see again. "The monologue is his preferred form of discourse."

11. Scanners (1981)

"You murdered the future." A medication prescribed to pregnant women gives their unborn children psychic powers, and the children are later rounded up to be used as weapons. A short cut to human evolution. Unethical science and corporate espionage conducted in blank-walled, sterile office buildings and remote factories. Mental abilities have physical ramifications: sparks fly as a computer is hacked through a phone line, a man's head explodes; a war is fought and lost and, finally, something entirely new is born from the ashes.

12. Maps To The Stars (2014)

As cold and sterile as Crash, but more openly critical (funny, too) — a mode of Cronenberg that I don't really know what to do with. Contrasting downfalls: a washed up and washed out actress and a bankable child star of a highly successful franchise, linked by the presence of a mysterious woman with burn scars and both haunted by ghosts. Hierarchies of indirect conversation, verdant gardens viewed through glass, a fridge stacked with energy drinks, weird robotic ringtones, mirrors showing reflections that nobody can bear to look at, sterile modern architecture, natural light and decorative dead trees. An obsession with the physical at the expense of the psychological. "Secrets kill." Who'd have thought Hollywood was such a poisonous place?

13. Eastern Promises (2007)

"I need to know who you are." What a strange film. The machinations of a Russian mafia family in London and a midwife's quest to expose the truth about the death of a pregnant young girl. A translated diary reveals buried monstrosities. Rumours of homosexuality as a motive for murder. People play both sides to stay alive. Tattoos as maps of a history and, more importantly, proof of authenticity. There's no reason not to trust these images. An outwardly unusual project for Cronenberg, but one that fits into his interest in identity that echoed throughout all three films he made in the 2000s, and one that works as a reversal of sorts of A History of Violence — how deep can you go before it's too far to escape?

14. A History of Violence (2005)

After interrupting an armed robbery and brutally killing the two perpetrators, a family man and pillar of his community is forced to confront his violent past against his will. An extension and expansion of the themes of Spider, in that the buried past is here forcibly shared by two families (the one he has created and the one he has escaped) rather than experienced solely by one man — and so the collapse of the charade is shared too. How do you protect the unit when you're the reason it's under threat? How do you escape it?

15. Spider (2002)

An objective film about subjectivity. A man is transferred from a prison hospital to a halfway house as a means to escalate his recovery and, once there, he replays events from his childhood that led him to this place. Cronenberg provides no history up front, only a succession of memories as they're lived and re-played by Spider as a way for him to confirm them as a truth, his truth, only for cracks to appear and for the whole thing to collapse under the weight of its artifice. A fascinating, if totally self-contained, film about breaking to rebuild, about healing, about the fragility of the human mind, and one that could only become richer with repeat viewings.

16. Rabid (1977)

A disease comes full circle. A revolutionary surgery leaves the victim of a motorcycle crash with a parasitic new organ and an insatiable bloodlust. A new nature, new instincts, new cravings. She does what her body tells her to and inadvertently unleashes a vampiric plague on society. The most impressive thing here is how quickly the disease spreads without her, from a secluded medical retreat in the mountains to the metropolis of Montreal. Sitting in a shopping mall, she sees a disease-stricken man she's never met violently attack another man, causing chaos, and she never for a second thinks that she's responsible for any of this. Why would she? And so this modern day Typhoid Mary, the only chance at a cure, escapes with the crowd. A city burns to the ground.

17. The Brood (1979)

Maybe the most frightening film Cronenberg has made, and a genuinely traumatic one, too. The collateral damage of a ruined family that unexplainably gets worse and worse. Also, I think, the Cronenberg film with the most single-scene set pieces, singular moments that illustrate precisely what is going on and give the whole thing a chopped-up, almost apocalyptic momentum, careening inevitably towards a conclusion that finally offers some kind of future for this family — but only by severing its past.

18. Naked Lunch (1991)

A real curio, one that I've seen twice now and I can't get my head around any of it. The dreamlike qualities of Burroughs's novel are all present, and it's hard to fault this as an adaptation of such a dense work, but beyond following Cronenberg down an increasingly (and impressively) bizarre rabbit hole, there doesn't seem to be all that much to think about — or maybe I'm thinking too much.

19. Fast Company (1979)

On some level, Fast Company is a loose exploration of the physical dangers that emerge within a battle of egos, but Cronenberg spends far more time on the day-to-day logistics and shady corporate interests that make a race-day happen, rather than how they facilitate this increasingly dangerous rivalry. As such, nothing is ever really explored much beyond the surface, and this fertile idea ends up closer to a goofy b-side to Bronco Billy than to anything else Cronenberg would go on to make.

Wednesday, 31 October 2018

The Curse of Frankenstein | Terence Fisher, 1957


The Curse of Frankenstein | Terence Fisher, 1957
The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp | Rembrandt van Rijn, 1632

Dr. Victor Frankenstein contemplates the murder of a renowned intellectual in Terence Fisher’s The Curse of Frankenstein. He has invited this man, a man with no living relatives, to harvest his brain for an experiment, and this murder will be the biggest step into moral depravity in the name of his creation. His plan is simple: lure the man to the top of the staircase in order to view the painting that hangs above it, then, once he is enraptured in the painting, push him through the banister to his death and make the whole thing look like a terrible accident.

The painting is Rembrandt’s The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp, one of the Flemish artist's most celebrated works. The painting depicts several doctors surrounding a corpse as a man, presumably Tulp, teaches them about the tendons and muscles in the human arm. However, none of the doctors are looking at the body, and are instead staring at the pages of a large book just beyond it. The corpse also appears to have two right hands, a refraction of the human form rendered invisible to these doctors by their own studiousness. A murder is committed beneath this painting in the name of science by a man perilously blind to the reality of his creation, choosing instead to focus on the theoretical. It’s easy to become monstrous when you ignore humanity.

Friday, 26 October 2018

London Film Festival 2018 | Burning (Lee Chang-dong)

London Film Festival 2018 | #3

“Sometimes I burn down greenhouses”. Five words that ignite Lee Chang-dong’s Burning, his first film in eight years, and set in motion a hazy, obsessive descent into chaos and paranoia. Based on a short story by the Japanese author Haruki Murakami and transplanted from Japan to the South Korean border city of Paju, Burning treads a similar if not identical path to the original text: Jong-su’s blossoming but casual relationship with Hae-mi, a pantomime student, is interrupted by the continued presence of the enigmatic Ben who, superficially at least, is her new lover. Soon after Ben tells Jong-su that he burns down greenhouses in his spare time, Hae-mi disappears without a trace. There are, of course, differences between Lee’s film and Murakami’s story besides the geographical switch. Jong-su is, here, a young graduate working odd jobs in the city while writing a novel in his spare time, whereas the equivalent character in the original text was a married, thirty-one year old author who becomes enthralled by Hae-mi but doesn’t have a history with her, as he does in the adaptation. In the story, her new boyfriend is younger than the narrator, but in Burning, the ages are reversed. Lee and co-writer Oh Jung-mi have also expanded Murakami’s text far beyond its original conclusion, keeping the elusive mystery at its heart in tact while digging a little further, opening new avenues that the short story carefully hinted at but never set out to explore — which is not to say Burning is any more conclusive or any less eerie than its source.

The most important of these changes is the switch to focus solely on young people. The dynamic of a married older man becoming jealous of a younger man’s imposition into a non-existent relationship with a young woman is not especially fertile ground, and Lee wisely avoids this in favour of grounding the conflict firmly in the rage felt by young people in Korea today, in the midst of a surge in youth unemployment. Jong-su has an education but no future prospects, taking on physical labour to earn a living: first making deliveries in the city, then caretaking his absent father’s ailing farm in the nearby countryside, where the sounds of North Korean propaganda broadcasts can be heard across the border. He meets Hae-mi, a girl he knew at school but doesn’t recognise anymore, herself estranged from her family due to credit card debts, and the two embark upon a fleeting romance. He gives her a pink digital watch that he wins in a raffle. They have sex in her tiny apartment, a room only ever illuminated briefly when the sunlight bounces fortuitously off a tower that looms large through the window. She goes on a trip to Africa and asks him to feed her cat until she returns. He does, but when she returns, she does so with Ben, a mysteriously moneyed man and the only Korean she met in Africa, only slightly older than the two of them but evidently more financially successful. He has a huge apartment in a plush building in the middle of the city, and he drives a charcoal-grey Porsche 911 Carrera. Ben’s sudden entrance, and his usurping of a fledgeling relationship, sparks a simmering jealousy within Jong-su, compounded by Hae-mi’s insistence on keeping both men in her life. And, so, the trio spend odd, protracted time together. They eat, drink, go to clubs, smoke. Jong-su compares Ben to Jay Gatsby and asks Hae-mi how much older he is than him, while Ben doesn’t say very much at all. He has everything Jong-su could ever want, but he doesn’t seem to do anything to earn it: when asked, Ben describes his work as “play”. But sometimes he burns down greenhouses. Roughly one every two months, he tells Jong-su, and he’s planning on burning down another one nearby.

Lee Chang-dong, a novelist before he turned to filmmaking, has an impressive track-record as a weaver of ambitious, intricately detailed and socially conscious narrative cinema. In Green Fish, his first film, an ex-soldier is lured into the criminal underworld by the prospect of earning enough money to do right by his family, displaced by the rampant development of their hometown. Peppermint Candy shows the life of a man in reverse, beginning with his suicide and tracking how his life has been destroyed in parallel with terrible events in the recent history of South Korea. In Oasis, Lee explores a taboo relationship between a mentally disabled man and a woman with cerebral palsy, while in Secret Sunshine, a single mother turns to religion after suffering unspeakable trauma, only to find the man who ruined her life has done the same. Poetry, his last film, follows an elderly woman trying to find meaning in the world around her by writing poetry, even as she’s forced into a morally repugnant cover-up to keep her grandson and his friends out of prison. Burning is more of the same. By positioning Jong-su and Ben, two men who exist at opposite ends of a generation that has long-since peaked, one a beneficiary of its early days, the other a victim of its decline, against each other, Lee makes literal the tension between the poor and the wealthy, and the resentment caused by a failure of the Korean government to create enough jobs for its young people over the duration of two administrations. Starting in 2012, former President Park Geun-hye was elected on a platform of steering the country towards a “creative economy”, encouraging entrepreneurship and job development in creative and innovation sectors. However, by 2014, youth unemployment rates were beginning to rise, and have been trending upwards ever since. Following Park’s impeachment for abuse of power, for which she is serving 24 years in prison, in 2016, President Moon Jae-in was elected on, again, a platform of job creation, and has introduced a higher base minimum wage with the intent of increasing economic growth by providing Koreans with a higher base income. However, this increase has put financial pressure on small businesses, forcing them to cut staff or shut down entirely, and has further lowered the number of available jobs.

Within this political and economic turbulence, it’s no wonder that Jong-su is immediately resentful of the comfortably and flashily wealthy Ben, and when Hae-mi suddenly vanishes this resentment develops into an all-consuming obsession: does Ben know more than he’s saying? Jong-su checks all the greenhouses in the area and none have been burned down. He instigates supposedly chance encounters with Ben to press him for answers. He visits Hae-mi’s family, and searches for clues in Ben’s apartment. He waits outside and closely tails Ben’s Porsche in a beaten-up pick-up truck, a vehicle totally at odds with the city traffic, borrowed from his father’s farm, following him aimlessly around town on the off-chance that he’s going to incriminate himself. These silent, brutally tense scenes, oscillating between shots of traffic seen through windscreens and close-ups of Jong-su’s tired but laser-focused eyes, are clearly inspired by Hitchcock’s Vertigo, another tale of transformative obsession. Like James Stewart in Vertigo, Jong-su has no idea what he’s getting himself into, and it’s hard to imagine that Ben doesn’t know he’s being followed. Lee, like Murakami, never clarifies details such as this, instead letting the ambiguities linger like a fog to ratchet up a dangerous tension — one that renders a knock on a car window one of the most terrifying moments in recent cinema.

As his quest for answers delivers nothing but frustration and dead ends, these ambiguities begin to look like facts to Jong-su. All the pieces fit together, but never conclusively. Every thread he pulls can be explained rationally. He buys into the idea that Ben could be responsible for Hae-mi’s disappearance with no proof. All he has is his anger towards a man who has everything he could ever want, and five words that have haunted him since he heard them: “Sometimes I burn down greenhouses.” It’s this resentment, established early on in the financial and romantic disparity between the two men, that drives Burning towards its conclusion. Lee creates tension from a place of random inequality, and the seething rage that stems from it within Jong-su. Hard workers don’t thrive in Burning’s Korea, playboys do, and it’s this idea that poisons Jong-su’s judgment, leaving him haunted by the ghost of a metaphor that might not even be metaphorical. He has so much faith in himself, in his rightness, that he has nowhere to go when he runs out of ideas. In this sense, Burning is a devastatingly sad film about a generation too young to benefit from the past and too old to benefit from the future, left to rot in limbo in the present. “Every morning, I still run past those five barns. Not one of them has yet burned down. Nor do I hear of any barn fires. Come December, the birds strafe overhead. And I keep on getting older.” Murakami’s story feels sparse and empty. Burning feels like an abyss.

Sunday, 14 October 2018

London Film Festival 2018 | Asako I & II; Monrovia, Indiana

London Film Festival 2018 | #2 

Foundations. Ryusuke Hamaguchi’s Asako I & II opens with an exaggerated love-at-first-sight encounter across a pile of firecrackers and spirals further into falsehoods from there. A romance between Asako, an outwardly quiet student, and Baku, a handsome slacker in sandals, blossoms quickly before Baku disappears without warning, leaving her broken-hearted. Years pass, and Asako meets Ryohei, a salaryman in Tokyo and the physical doppelganger of Baku, though the two men’s personalities are nothing alike. At first Asako resists the reignition, or confirmation, of her attraction, but, following a major earthquake that tests the infrastructure of Tokyo, the two reunite in a city that holds firm and they start to build a life there. Is Ryohei a perfection of Baku, in that he looks the same but remains a constant and reliable presence in her life, or is he a reduction, a mannequin with the same face but none of the vibrancy and mystery that drew her to him in the first place? Hamaguchi cultivates this unplaceable indecisiveness by framing Asako as a blank slate. She’s constantly in thought but rarely expressive, and Hamaguchi ensures that it’s easy to misjudge or misinterpret where her heart truly lies. Her mind is always elsewhere. She’s never quite passive but never active, either. She doesn’t drive, and relies on Ryohei to drive her to places outside of the city, and she always seems to blend into the background. During dinner parties, she stands behind the counter that separates the living room from the kitchen in her apartment as her friends and lover sit and talk at a table in front of it; she’s never out of the conversation, but she never feels like a part of it. She’s perpetually torn, between love and loneliness, the past and the present, Baku and Ryohei, certainty and mystery — and that’s no way to live. But maybe, after all, we’re doomed to never escape the ghosts of our pasts, especially if we decide that we can’t see them.

It’s impossible to ignore the ghosts that haunt Frederick Wiseman’s Monrovia, Indiana, a portrait of small rural town in the American midwest with its history firmly in the past. Kids are taught about the town’s most successful citizen, a high-school basketball star from the 1920s whose name still ordains the school gymnasium; a man is awarded a fifty year service certificate by his masonic lodge in a stumbling ceremony conducted by similarly elderly men; a priest delivers an impassioned funeral service for a lifelong resident of the town; population growth is discussed and debated by the town council. Wiseman takes these brief fragments of his time in Monrovia and stitches them together to create an impression of the town as it exists to him, in this moment. And what he witnesses here is the gradual dismantling of a way of life that doesn’t fit into the idea of what the modern world should be. In perhaps the most telling scene, farmers gather in a cavernous, mostly empty barn for an auction. The auctioneer frenetically calls bids on a combine harvester with a starting price of $100,000 as the farmers in the room silently watch on. Farming is debilitatingly expensive, yet it’s the foundation of Monrovia’s floundering economy. Meanwhile, a property development company representative aggressively pitches a new housing project to the council as a means to boost the town’s population, while one resident’s complaints that the fire hydrant near his home is not fit for purpose fall on deaf ears. There can be no progress without the means to handle it but the council go after it anyway, thoughtlessly sold on the financial benefits more people will bring. Wiseman’s patient editing allows the cumulation of these images to develop into something truly apocalyptic. All the old heroes are dead. There’s no life in Monrovia anymore, but the future looks even bleaker; Wiseman’s camera lingers in a graveyard. Soon, there will be no roots left in this town, only the ghosts of lives that nobody can remember.

Wednesday, 10 October 2018

London Film Festival 2018 | Happy as Lazzaro, The Chambermaid

London Film Festival 2018 | #1

“This month, too, the debt increases.” The smell of money lingers throughout Alice Rohrwacher’s Happy as Lazzaro. A community of labourers: men, women, children alike; spend their days tending to the land of a tobacco farm in an undisturbed corner of the Italian countryside. As sharecroppers, an outlawed practice that they believe to be the norm, they are not paid, instead given a share of the crop to trade with; as long as the workers remain financially indebted to their landlord, they can be exploited and forced to work the land. Among these farmers is Lazzaro, a wide-eyed, kind-hearted and serene young man whose good nature is easily and regularly taken advantage of. He makes the landlord’s son a cup of coffee and the two seem to become friends, but, when asked why he stopped working to do so, Lazzaro enthusiastically replies: “you ordered me to.” Rohrwacher’s film lives within this dynamic between oppressed and oppressor. The power of money corrupts every relationship the isolated community has with the outside world, and when their lives are suddenly upended, these farmers are thrown into a poisonous modern society and forced to adapt to its rules. Time passes: a new currency, a new season; but the rich still exploit the poor. Lazzaro sees unemployed men and women, most with their families, most of them migrant workers, walk to a secluded industrial site in the dead of morning to bid against each other for a day’s work; out of desperation, the people willing to work for the lowest rate get the job. By placing the ever-youthful Lazzaro at the heart of two communities struggling to survive, both a bucolic farm corrupted by capitalism and a city ravaged and consumed by it, Rohrwacher connects a scandal of the past with the myriad atrocities occurring in plain sight today; Lazzaro, the ageless observer, echoes a history that never went away. Life goes on.

A similar, if not entirely comparable figure illuminates Lila Avilés’ The Chambermaid, which follows a 24 year old single mother, Eve, as she works long days cleaning the rooms of a luxury hotel in Mexico City. A determined and efficient woman, Eve is hoping for a promotion that would allow her both more money and more time with her young son, who she barely sees — but she’s not the only person who wants the job. Avilés takes a directly observational approach to documenting Eve’s work, choosing long takes and fixed wide-shots to emphasise the care she takes over her duties, and the time she spends doing so. The rooms she cleans, designed for transience, become a second home to her, or at least the ghost of a home: all off-whites and dull-greys, with the occasional painting on the wall doing little to add colour. The large windows of each room offer a panoramic view of a city skyline behind glass, always outside, always distant. Her uniform is charcoal grey, and she wears a hairnet on duty; no evidence of her presence can be left in these rooms. She’s cagey and distant from her fellow workers, as they all seem to be to each other, and every conversation she has boils down to some kind of transaction. Hotel guests curtly demand more towels or toiletries, while colleagues militaristically bark information over walkie-talkies (“copy that”) or make small talk before asking for help with a shift; one colleague’s initial kindness towards Eve is ultimately revealed as a sales pitch for moisturiser and tupperware. Avilés’ camera never leaves the hotel, and while this 42-floored hotel is too big to ever feel claustrophobic, it’s hard to shake the idea that there are more important things going on elsewhere. As such, Avilés’ focus on the micro, one woman’s means to an end, creates an impression of the macro. Fleeting moments reveal the ways in which people take necessary shortcuts to reach their goals, and Eve’s day-to-day struggles show how easy it is to be rendered invisible in a hierarchy built on pitting workers against one another.

Friday, 21 September 2018

Too Late The Hero | Robert Aldrich, 1970




Too Late The Hero | Robert Aldrich, 1970

A reckless army captain quickly devises and actions a plan of attack, designed to emphasise his own bravery and intellect with no thought to strategy or his orders. His men protest to determinedly deaf ears. His plan is simple but fraught with danger: he walks alone into the radio hut of a Japanese military camp, nonchalantly to avoid suspicion ("if he does see me, he's likely to assume I'm one of his chaps"), and takes out the Japanese radio operator. Then, when the coast is clear, a British radio operator follows him in and sends a vital message of warning back to base. Once this message is sent, they all walk out undetected.

The captain arrives at the hut. Aldrich cuts quickly from a close up of the captain's eye in the crack of the door to a mid-shot of the hut's interior, before cutting back to a mid-shot of the captain as he walks inside to take out the operator. This all occurs in less than a second, yet in this time he has moved from outside to inside. The cut moves faster than time and the action seems rushed. Something suddenly feels inexplicably wrong, but everything is going according to plan. Time grinds to a halt as the captain stands alone in enemy territory. Doubt creeps in. Maybe this wasn't such a good idea after all.

Monday, 6 August 2018

Attack | Robert Aldrich, 1956


Attack | Robert Aldrich, 1956

Division and unity. Two lieutenants, a captain and a colonel play a tense game of cards near the end of the war. One of the lieutenants recently led a dangerous attack against the Nazis, ordered by the captain with the promise of military support if required. The attack failed and, due to the captain's reluctance to send in the promised back-up, several men died in the battle. The colonel, an old friend of the captain’s and in need of his support for his future political ambitions, yet fully aware of his inability to lead men into war, allows him to remain in command, against both lieutenants’ wishes. During the card game, Aldrich separates the four men in the frame across a table with a pillar in the background: on one side, the colonel and the captain; on the other, the two lieutenants. No trust in their superiors, no middle ground to find, constantly at odds with gamblers. They try in vain to convince the colonel to take the captain off the frontline and put him behind a desk. “Then our worries are over, all we’ve got to do is fight the war”. But they fail. And so they return to the front, together with their men. Out in the open air there’s nothing to separate them, the dividing pillar replaced by a uniting lieutenant to rally around. They have a job to do, a duty to both their fellow soldiers and their country. They have no choice but to follow the captain’s poorly thought out plan of attack, designed to prove his own bravery to the colonel while his men risk their lives. They march blindly into the unknown. An act of self-advancement and an egregious failure of leadership, all at the expense of men in no position to say no to orders. There’s nowhere to hide on the battlefield. Useless, the captain stays inside.

Friday, 20 July 2018

Absolute Power | Clint Eastwood, 1997

Absolute Power | Clint Eastwood, 1997

A master thief on the run appears in his estranged daughter’s apartment disguised as a police officer. He stands still, arms by his side, head tilted. The photograph on the right is of his ex-wife, the mother of his daughter, who died a year earlier. The room itself is symmetrical but the composition is unbalanced, showing an open doorway on the left and part of a wall on the right. The shot, from the perspective of the daughter, suggests how unusual his presence is in her life. He awkwardly stands out among her belongings, pretending to be a figure of authority when in reality he’s anything but, while her mother’s picture creates a conflict between parents, drawing attention away from him and onto her memory, the pain his actions have caused, and the impossibility of recompense. This photograph seems to have been on the table for years, while her father could leave through the door at any moment.

The Social Network | David Fincher, 2010


The Social Network | David Fincher, 2010

First a spelling mistake, then a billion dollar idea.